Claire McCormack interview Rod McLeod, Director of SOS Great Lakes

Originally published: 7 June 2017

WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT OPG'S PLAN TO STORE NUCLEAR WASTE ON THE SHORE OF LAKE HURON?

Listen to Claire McCormack's interview with Rod McLeod (http://bit.ly/2r31zU7), Director of SOS Great Lakes, for more information on why we are concerned about:

(1) the storage of nuclear waste in a Deep Geological Repository (DGR);

(2) Ontario Power Generation's (OPG) planning and reasoning; and

(3) public acceptance in Kincardine (ON) and in the Great Lakes community.

Click here for more interview clips! http://bit.ly/2r31zU7

For more information about the plan to bury nuclear waste on the shore of Lake Huron visit our website: www.sosgreatlakes.org

Video Transcript:

Text: Claire McCormick interviews Rod McLeod, Director of SOS Great Lakes, January 2017

The plan for Kincardine is to dig a hole 690 meters. It’s less than a kilometer from the shore of Lake Huron, and their [OPG’s] plan is to take all their low and intermediate waste from Bruce and from elsewhere in Ontario - Darlington, Pickering - and put it in this big hole and seal it and abandon it. There will be no ability to monitor it going forward. There are other DGRs in the world that are only 75 meters deep, and those can be monitored, and those have been successful. There is no DGR similar to the one OPG is planning in Kincardine that has ever succeeded. Everywhere in the world it’s been tried, it’s failed.




Nuclear Waste Dump on Lake Huron: Environmental Assessment, Risks, and Resistance

Originally published: 25 May 2017

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency asked Ontario Power Generation (OPG) to provide additional information regarding their plan to bury nuclear waste in a Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) on the shore of Lake Huron.

The Agency chastised OPG for its superficial exploration of alternative locations and emphasized that indigenous peoples’ perspectives need to be better represented. This is the SIXTH time OPG has been asked to provide more information on the project.

Tomorrow, on May 26th, 2017, OPG will respond to the Agency's April 5th request for more information.

Listen to our Vice President, Ellen Dailey, discuss the risks of building a nuclear waste dump near the lake and why we should fight to protect it.


See the full interview

Read SOS Great Lakes' press release

Read SOS Great Lakes' submission to the CEAA


Video Transcript:

Text: Paul Miller interviews Ellen Dailey, VP of SOS Great Lakes, April 7th, 2017

The Environmental Agency [CEAA] just issued its report Wednesday evening [April 5, 2017], and asked, again, for additional information about alternative sites. From our reckoning this is about the sixth time that OPG has been asked to look specifically at alternative sites.

Alternative means of the project is a specific requirement of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, and they [OPG] just have not fulfilled this request…

They [CEAA] want specific information about sites: alternative locations away from the lake…

I think the Assessment Agency [CEAA] understood the public’s concerns, they understood the experts’ concerns that weighed in on this, and they took that information seriously and have asked OPG to step up to the plate.




Great Lakes Threatened With Radioactive Waste

Originally published: 19 January 2017

Right now, there is a plan to bury nuclear waste on the shore of Lake Huron. A plan that could result in the pollution of the largest basin of fresh water in the world for 100, 000 years, the Great Lakes Basin.

Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is a Canadian power company that plans to bury up to 400, 000 cubic metres of radioactive nuclear waste less than 1 km from Lake Huron. This means building a nuclear waste dump on the shore of the Great Lakes, a source of drinking water for 40 million people in Canada and the United States.

We are SOS Great Lakes. We are challenging OPG’s dump.

We are among more than 100 organizations, 100 communities and 150 000 people in Canada and the U.S. who want Catherine McKenna, the Canadian Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, to say NO to the dump.

We believe that if the 40 million people who rely on the Great Lakes for drinking water knew about this highly risky and needless threat to the Great Lakes, they would never allow it to happen.

We can’t reach those people by ourselves. Join us. Share this story.

Your lakes, your choice.

Read about 8 reasons to stop the DGR

Follow SOS Great Lakes for updates

Reach out to your government

Video Transcript:

A Canadian power company plans to build a nuclear waste dump on the shores of the Great Lakes

The source of drinking water for 40 million people.

[Clock ticking noise]

The Great Lakes, the largest basin of fresh water in the world. From Thunder Bay in the west, to the gulf of the St. Lawrence in the east, and as far south as the Illinois River, the Great Lakes deliver fresh water to 40 million people in cities, towns, and villages in Canada and the United States. They irrigate hundreds of millions of acres of farmland, and support the world’s largest inland fishery.

Not the most logical place to build a nuclear waste dump. Yet unbelievably, that is exactly what Ontario Power Generation is planning to do. OPG proposes to abandon radioactive waste in a dump on the shore of the great lakes, and will risk our waters for up to 1 million years.

Their underground nuclear waste dump is less than one kilometer, about 900 yards, from the shore of Lake Huron, at the Bruce Nuclear plant. OPG says they will use proven technology to dig their dump as deep as Toronto’s CN tower is high, and that the radioactive waste will be isolated forever.

OPGs dump technology is anything but proven. Every underground nuclear waste dump in the world has failed and leaked its deadly toxins. Experts say it is not if, but when the dump will leak radioactive gases and material into ground as material in the dump decomposes.

Even OPGs experts admit the dump will eventually fill with water, become unstable, and leak. When it leaks, it could contaminate the drinking water of 40 million people, and our environment, forever.

Unless… you help us stop it.

We are SOS Great Lakes, a non-profit group of Canadians and Americans who started fighting this in 2012. We are challenging OPGs in the Canadian federal court. More than 184 Canadian and American municipalities oppose this plan. A growing number of U.S. politicians are urging politicians in Canada to stop this project.

Join us. Share this story. Help end this threat to the largest body of fresh water in the world.

Please, help us tell this important story. Urge your politicians to act responsibly. Donate to help us win this fight.

Your lakes, your choice.

[Clock ticking noise]




Nuclear Waste Dump in the Great Lakes Basin? Teaser 2

Originally published: 17 January 2017

This water is valuable. Why risk contamination?

Water from the Great Lakes is used by 40 million people in Canada and the United States. The lakes irrigate hundreds of millions of acres of farmland and support the world’s largest inland fishery.

Video Transcript:

The Great Lakes deliver freshwater to 40 million people in cities, towns, and villages in Canada and the United States. They irrigate hundreds of millions of acres of farmland and support the world’s largest inland fishery.

Not the most logical place to build a nuclear waste dump…




Nuclear Waste Dump in the Great Lakes Basin? Teaser 1

Originally published: 16 January 2017

Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is a Canadian power company that plans to bury up to 400, 000 cubic metres of radioactive nuclear waste less than 1 km from Lake Huron. This means building a nuclear waste dump on the shore of the Great Lakes, a source of drinking water for 40 million people in Canada and the United States.

Will you let them?

Video Transcript:

A Canadian power company plans to build a nuclear waste dump on the shore of the Great Lakes

The source of drinking water for 40 million people.

WILL YOU LET THEM?